A useful niche product, integration or small customer base removes execution work.
A narrow differentiated product, real transactions, transparent support work and transferable rights.
Effort: 30–100 team hours
Commercial wins: 5–15 paying users or 2–3 paid B2B pilots; one buyer-qualified path.
Short history can work, but cash-flow underwriting is provisional.
reported exit · Closing date undisclosed
Relevant metrics: 300 customers; $2k revenue label; lifetime-deal model.
Buyer rationale not disclosed; classification is an analytical hypothesis, not a statement of buyer intent.
Five-month sale process as reported. ARR and lifetime-deal labels conflict; exact closing date unknown.
Inspect evidence ↗reported exit · Closing date undisclosed
Relevant metrics: About $70 MRR at two months; 5–6 paying users in narrative.
Buyer rationale not disclosed; classification is an analytical hypothesis, not a statement of buyer intent.
Historical case. Four days from listing, not idea. $12k subsequent freelance work is NOT part of exit price.
Inspect evidence ↗reported exit · Closing date undisclosed
Relevant metrics: ~$14.5k reported annual revenue; seller reports 1–2 hours/week.
Buyer rationale not disclosed; classification is an analytical hypothesis, not a statement of buyer intent.
One-time licenses / prepaid usage conflict with ARR label; sold homepage is price source. No reliable multiple.
Inspect evidence ↗reported exit · Closing date undisclosed
Relevant metrics: $6,900 reported annual revenue.
Buyer rationale not disclosed; classification is an analytical hypothesis, not a statement of buyer intent.
Distribution, retention, rights and closing date undisclosed.
Inspect evidence ↗reported exit · Closing date undisclosed
Relevant metrics: Public revenue figures use inconsistent periods.
Buyer rationale not disclosed; classification is an analytical hypothesis, not a statement of buyer intent.
Do not treat asking/exit labels or run-rate/lifetime numbers as clean comparable financials.
Inspect evidence ↗